Frank. 10/12 '14
Just a few disorganized thoughts on the movie Frank, which is often wonderful and often stupefyingly frustrating:
- Michael Fassbender is a brilliant actor. What he does with body language is fascinating; he never reaches or pushes too far.
- There's a fine line between being surprised by a movie and feeling jerked around by arbitrary plot and tone shifts.
- A movie/play is at its most maddening not when it's bad, but when you can feel the writer & director on the verge of brilliance, but they won't let themselves sustain it because they don't trust in what they've created.
- I'm not sure how 80 - 110 minutes became a length standard for American films. I'm all for trimming the fat, but the last two new movies I've watched - Frank and the Grand Budapest Hotel - might have benefited from at another half hour, as long as it was used wisely.
- Still, both movies also introduced unnecessary plot threads. Grand Budapest features stunningly glorious visuals and revels in very precise human behavior and language, but the tall tale keeps getting sidetracked by its own whimsy as it unfolds. (No matter - it's still fantastic.) Frank, on the other hand, doesn't have enough faith in the titular character, the music he creates, and the way he affects those around him, and sends us on a Part Two that feels like a different, dumbed-down movie - one that ignores some of the more interesting questions asked in Part One. Worse, a good portion of the latter half hinged on the wildly inconsistent behavior and motivations of the "audience character," John, who makes some remarkably stupid choices. The more we consider what he's been through, the less sense his behavior makes.
- I love Maggie Gyllenhaal. She is a fearless actress who looks like a real person. Her character in Frank is far from "likable," but Gyllenhaal gives her dimensions and steers clear of cliche and stereotype. We get her. It's an excellent performance.
- There are a couple characters in Frank who are absolute ciphers. I'm blaming you, screenwriters. I realize you wanna focus on the lead singer with the giant fake head, but you gotta give the rhythm section something.
- The first fifteen minutes are beautifully executed. They're funny, mysterious, and entertaining.
- At times, Frank does a great job of exploring and questioning the link between mental illness and creativity. But it's deflating when some of the mental illness becomes the kind of movie mental illness that only flares up to create conflict or propel the plot in a different direction (consider Frank's "likable" song). The actors sell it best they can, though.
- Despite my issues with the John character, I really like how he thinks he changes and grows during the course of the movie, when he's actually regressing a bit. That's something you don't see much.
- It's good to have themes in movies. But it's less good to allow a character, late in the film, to explain one of the themes to you. In case you missed it.
- It's perilous to portray the results of creativity in a movie. Consider, for example, how bland and tuneless poor Mr. Holland's opus turned out to be. But the music in Frank is breathtaking. It's alive. There are a thousand ways the music we hear could have gone wrong, but it's kind of exhilirating how well the songwriters and musicians walked that tightrope. The word "amazing" is way overused, but some of this music amazed me.
- Despite my frustrations with the movie, I recommend Frank (which I have been dying to see for weeks now), especially to those with a fascination for offbeat music. It'll stay with you, and it's often entertaining and smart, even when it isn't.
- Finally: Jill and I were very happy to see certain musicians thanked in the credits.
If you've seen Frank and wanna talk about it, make with the comments. Jill and I would love to hear your thoughts. It's that kind of movie.
I liked it a lot and it made me think a lot about 5-act structure. I'm not sure what else to say that hasn't already need said here. I agree with you about "you gotta give the rhythm section something."
I've added it to our netflix queue. Thanks!
Re: representing the results of creativity, it is dangerous, but if you get it right... well, as seen above, ja?
Some movies where they got this pitch perfect: This is Spinal Tap (parody of course, but it's 100% spot on in every song). Happiness (Faith's song is the song Faith would write, and it's a good song).
A movie where they got this right but it's not enough to save the movie: El Cantante. Marc Anthony both stars in the film and sings Hector Lavoe's original songs. His covers are stunningly good. But the plot is so dull it doesn't matter.
Even in print you can get this wrong. Much as I love Dan Simmons' Hyperion novels (to the point of rereading them), I was disappointed when he finally chose to insert a few stanzas by the epic poet character and they're... just okay. It's not a dealbreaker, but maybe he shouldn't have.
This also makes me think of Frank Herbert's Dune novels - how's THAT for getting far afield - and how throughout them you're sold on the idea that the Bene Gesserit are the ultimate cynical engineers of religious belief (a level of meta that gets lost in the 1980s film of course)... then in one of his last books we discover...
[Uh, spoiler alert for people still convinced they will finish those books, you've had 30 years you know]...
... That the Jews are still around and hiding out on a planet and only the Bene Gesserit know, which is neat.
But the Jewish character is straight out of Fiddler on the Roof. He's a horrible cliche. And he chooses to make two references to scripture... both of which are New Testament.
Suddenly you realize the author either never had a clue what he was talking about or (as I think is more likely in this case) quit doing his homework at some point in the series. And the whole thing is just not as cool.
(That particular bit is reprised by Dan Simmons and he does it oh, so much better.)
>>[Uh, spoiler alert for people still convinced they will finish those books, you've had 30 years you know]...
This made me laugh out loud.
That is all. :)
I have not seen this, and want to. We saw the "band" on the Colbert Report, thought "this is a really cool idea," and then watched the interview not go well, the performance seemed lackluster, it was ultimately forgettable.
I agree with Lindsey that the Colbert interview and performance were kinda dull, but they hooked me anyway. I'm a sucker for these subjects.