Maybe some of you can help me out with this. 

I like the book A Wrinkle In Time, and I appreciate how the movie is a little inescapeable right now. I think this is a good thing. I will take Ted to see it when we can swing it and showings are less crowded. 

Spoilers for A Wrinkle In Time (the book, not the movie) follow. 

There is an obstacle in my heart about this story. The first time I read it (I might have been seven or so), I had to stop when they described Calvin O'Keefe's mother. It made me so upset that I cried uncontrollably, and I couldn't finish the book for years. Calvin's mother is described early on. She's described as a miserable woman with a messy house. The point of having her this way is that Calvin wouldn't be missed if he takes off on an adventure with the Murry family. Right? She's too busy and unhappy to show up banging on the door, saying, "My son wasn't home in time for dinner, where is he?" One more kid in that house wouldn't be missed, right? I felt so sorry for her, so angry that she was left alone, forgotten, that it distracted me from everything else. 

I don't have a copy of A Wrinkle In Time around to refer to, only my shoddy memory of the book. The first time I read it, I knew that there was a very sad mom in the book, it upset me, and I moved on to something else. The second time I read it, I grudgingly finished the book, liking many aspects of the story, but not fully understanding or cherishing it. I think I moved back to the Narnia series, and then there were too many paperbacks lying around that weren't going to read themselves, so Stephen King was up next, and then John Lennon had a date with destiny, so I was obsessing about music for a while. 

What bothered me was, "why should I try to wrap my head around all of these heavy duty scientific concepts when you can't seem to balance the fact that you're chasing after a poor imprisoned daddy, but nobody seems to care about a poor imprisoned mommy, staring sadly into a sink full of dirty dishes?" 

I wish I could remember the wording of the passage describing Calvin O'Keefe's mother. All I remember was that it was extremely clear to me that this was a woman with a strong and serious mental illness characterized by depression. I'm shedding tears right now, just thinking about it. I mentioned it to other people who love that book, and they've said, "well, yeah, she's kind of a throwaway character." 

a) there is no such thing as a throwaway character. everything in your story is part of its foundation, otherwise get rid of it. if it's still there when it's published, it's important.

b) HAVE YOU NOT READ THIS DESCRIPTION???

I haven't read any of the other books in the series, because I have no proof that Calvin's Mother is saved, or that her imprisonment is justified. It's just that she's a "bad person," and Calvin should totally leave her to go play Shining Time Station with the Murrys. Did anything ever happen with her? 

The last time I read this, I was babysitting. There was a thunderstorm, and a power failure. I picked through the bookshelves with a flashlight, and then sat in my young charge's bedroom, reading A Wrinkle In Time by candlelight, accompanied by rain on the windows and the susurration of the child's breathing as he slept. It was the perfect way to read it. However, I had to take a deep breath, swallow my pride, read the passage about Calvin's mom, and store it for later, knowing that I would deal with those feelings and maybe write something about her in the future. 

I guess I'm going to have to deal with this. I'm really worried about Calvin's mother. On the other hand, maybe she and Calvin's stuffed tiger escaped and went sledding. 

EDITED TO ADD:

Editing editing editing editing editing editing editing Jarnsaxa Rising. 

MORE
3/17 '18 7 Comments
The point of Calvin's mother and his general home life in the first book I think isn't to give Calvin a ready excuse for being away and not noticed. It's meant to point out that one can feel an outcast even in ones own home. Calvin's home life is one of poverty and pain, and he marvels at the warm support Meg receives from her family--even the very "normal" twins whom Meg envys in moments of self-loathing. Another reason for Mrs. O'Keefe is to comment on and also criticize an aspect of rural New England life: how grinding poverty can be so much a part of the fabric of life (the O'Keefes are a village family going back generations) that no one even notices or expects anything about that to change.

Calvin's poverty is again highlighted in the second book, when we also learn more about the humanity of Mr. Jenkins, the school principal (who in the first book is only outlined in a stereotypical fashion both different and the same as Calvin's mother). And in book three, we learn Mrs. O'Keefe's back story, how she came to be who she was. It's heartbreaking and completely worth reading.

For whatever it's worth, Calvin's mother is completely edited from the movie, and Calvin's difficult home life is reduced to an upper-middle-class father berating him for his poor grades. It's a shocking mis-read of the novel in my opinion, especially by a director who chose to place the movie in Los Angeles and seemed so determined to address issues of race.
Oh, don't spoil it for me! You've really whetted my appetite for the next two books.
Oh dear. Sorry. I have so many thoughts about the movie, it sometimes leaks out around the edges. Do let me know when you've seen the movie; would love a discussion about it.
I do not disagree with this post at
All, and need to re-read the series.
Now I’m really curious. I think I’d better re-read AWIT as quickly as possible, and get started on the rest.
Calvin's mother's story is thoroughly contextualized in the third book of the series, as I recall. No spoilers, but...you may want to read the story at least that far...
GOOD. I feel much better now.